UK high streets have suffered a second month in a row of falling retail sales but a better performance from clothing put a silver lining on the gloom.
Like-for-like sales dropped by 1.7% in March compared with the same period in 2013, with the later timing of Easter this year blamed for the fall, according to figures from the British Retail Consortium (BRC).
The timing of Easter deepened the ongoing declines being suffered by embattled grocery retailers but fashion stores did better as the mild weather encouraged shoppers while a strong Mother's Day also helped. Dresses, blouses, slippers and men's shorts all sold well, helping to boost clothing by comparison with a period last year which was depressed by severe cold weather.
Footwear and health and beauty were also strongly-performing categories while food and home products -most affected by the timing of Easter - showed a decline.
BRC director-general Helen Dickinson said: "These sales figures are stronger than might have been expected given the fact that Easter has fallen so late this year.
"Fashion has performed particularly well. Retailers have worked hard to create popular new collections, and have been rewarded with strong demand for women's clothing and footwear in particular. This improves on the slow start to the season last year when shoppers were more reluctant to spruce up their wardrobes."
She said retailers hit by the timing of Easter would be looking to April's figures to see whether declines suffered in March were balanced out.
Online sales rose 12.8% last month, helped by the lack of Easter holidays, which tend to drive consumers out of the house and to the shops.
For the three-month period to March, food sales were down 2.7% on the year before.
It accelerated a decline since last autumn which is likely to be exacerbated by a coming price war as the major supermarkets aim to head off the threat from discounters Aldi and Lidl.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article