The owner of Virgin Media said it has no plans for a takeover of ITV after snapping up 6.4% of the broadcaster's shares from rival BSkyB today.
US cable giant Liberty Global said it was excited to be a shareholder of ITV after the "opportunistic and attractive" investment in its largest market.
The sale by BSkyB has raised £481 million and is the final piece of the 17.9% stake it took in 2006 in a move that scuppered a takeover of ITV by NTL, which later became Virgin Media. BSkyB was subsequently ordered to reduce its stake in ITV to below 7.5% due to competition concerns.
Liberty, which is headed by Colorado-based billionaire John Malone, broke into the UK market last year with a £10 billion takeover of Virgin. At the time of the deal, Liberty vowed to become a "disruptive challenger" in the pay TV market.
Announcing the acquisition of its stake today, Liberty told the City that it does not intend to make an offer for ITV.
However, shares in ITV jumped by 9% to around 200p after the acquisition.
Liberty chief executive Mike Fries said: "This is an opportunistic and attractive investment for us in our largest cable market. ITV is the leading commercial broadcaster in the UK and we're excited to be shareholders."
BSkyB originally spent £940 million on the ITV stake in November 2006, snapping up the shares at 135p each.
It suffered a near £350 million hit in 2010 when it sold a 10.4% stake at 48.5p each - totalling £196 million - after a decision by the Court of Appeal upheld the Government's ruling that it must sell down its 17.9% stake.
Sky's original shares raid took the market by surprise and infuriated major NTL shareholder Sir Richard Branson.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article