THE chairman of the powerful Treasury Committee has accused RBS of being "obtuse" with MPs and questioned the bank's ability to be straightforward with customers.
Andrew Tyrie MP is to write to the bank's chairman Sir Philip Hampton, and discuss the matter in the committee after the summer recess.
That comes after the bank submitted "additional comments" following oral evidence given at the committee last month by deputy chief executive Chris Sullivan and Derek Sach, head of the bank's controversial Global Restructuring Group.
In a letter to Mr Tyrie and the committee, Mr Sullivan says he accepts that the GRG was indeed a profit centre, as described by Sir Andrew Large in his report on RBS's small business lending last November.
A profit centre is an accounting term which means a part of a business that is accounted for on a standalone basis.
Mr Tyrie said: "RBS had not objected to the term 'profit centre' when given extensive opportunity to comment on drafts of Sir Andrew's report last year.
"Yet it decided to contest the term in evidence to the committee, not only in a written statement in February, but also repeatedly in its public hearing in June.
"Following the committee's decision to write to Sir Andrew Large for clarification, RBS has now offered the committee what it euphemistically describes as 'additional comments'. In fact, they have done a belated U-turn."
In his letter, Mr Sullivan says it was "indeed the case that the financial performance of GRG was monitored" which was a "standard accounting practice across all sectors of our business". He goes on: "However, what Mr Sach and I were taking issue with is the way others have used Sir Andrew's report to suggest that GRG had a profit motive with a prejudice against our customers, rather than a turnaround motive."
According to the letter from Mr Sullivan, GRG has recorded a substantial loss over recent years.
But Mr Tyrie said: "It's not as if the facts have changed. So it now appears that RBS has been wilfully obtuse with the committee.
"If this is how RBS deals with a parliamentary committee, how much can customers and regulators rely on it to be straightforward with them?"
Mr Sullivan had also responded to the committee on the extent of the bank's input into the conclusions of the report by its legal adviser Clifford Chance into the workings of the GRG, which the bank claimed "cleared" it of most accusations in the independent Tomlinson report.
Mr Sullivan, who is leaving RBS next year, had previously indicated he had not seen the report before it was published. Now he has confirmed he did see a draft but any input from bank executives was confined to "the correction of facts, typographical errors, suggested points of clarification and changes to syntax", not all of which were accepted.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article