Budget airline easyJet has been counting the cost of unrest and political tensions affecting Israel, Egypt and Russia after its latest trading update prompted the City to scale back forecasts for annual profits.
Chief executive Carolyn McCall said the airline expected pre-tax profits for the year to the end of September to be in the range of £545 million to £570 million.
This represents an increase of at least 14 per cent on the year before but City experts had pencilled in a figure of £572 million.
Ms McCall said the expected range assumes "no further significant disruption" and "includes the impact from the situations in Israel, Egypt and Moscow".
She said the quarterly performance was "solid" and that the airline was "well positioned to continue to deliver sustainable growth and returns".
Easyjet also said revenue per seat growth at Gatwick had been hit by its increased capacity at the airport after it picked up flying slots from rival Flybe.
But it said there was a significant opportunity over the next two years to drive improvement in revenue performance.
Total revenues for the third quarter grew 8.6 per cent compared with the same period last year to £1.24 billion and revenue per seat grew by 1.7 per cent to £62.47, or 2.7 per cent at constant currency.
But this was expected to slow to one per cent at constant currency for the second half as a whole as capacity grows.
Richard Hunter, head of equities at stockbrokers Hargreaves Lansdown, said while the profits guidance had undershot expectations, the figures showed a "very strong quarter" for easyJet.
Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Robin Byde said: "The 'miss' on full year guidance is clearly fairly minor and there are mitigating factors from the various political situations, and there is always the possibility that easyJet is being overly cautious.
"However we think that this outlook statement adds to investor unease that consensus forecasts have generally run ahead."
EasyJet's low-fares model has helped it and budget rival Ryanair weather an increasingly competitive European short-haul market, while traditional carriers have struggled.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article