Royal Dutch Shell's chief executive Ben van Beurden has noted the oil and gas giant plans to invest billions of dollars off Shetland in coming years, signalling the company has no major concerns about the prospect of Scottish independence.
Asked if Shell was making contingency plans for how to respond to a vote in favour of independence in September, Mr van Beurden said:
"As I've said before in December I think we would prefer it for the UK to remain a single country. There is of course uncertainty that would flow from a Scottish independence outcome but then having said that we would of course deal with Scottish independence in the way that we would have to. I don't think there is in that sense anything that we are deeply concerned about."
Mr van Beurden, who took charge in January, said the North Sea still had a big part to play in the company's plans although he intends to sell off billions of dollars of assets around the world.
While Shell has put three relatively small assets off Scotland up for sale, Mr van Beurden noted: "You have to bear in mind that there's also significant growth still. We still invest for the next few years two billion dollars a year particularly in Clair and Schiehallion (West of Shetland) so it's not as if we are completely stepping away from the North Sea. We are just engaged in the normal active portfolio management where we prune ourselves of end of life, late life assets and where ownership is better had elsewhere because there is niche or specialist capability ... and where basically we have bigger bang for our buck elsewhere. "
The Dutch executive was speaking to reporters after Shell posted a 33 per cent increase in quarterly earnings, helped by high oil prices.
The company made $6.1 billion (£3.6bn) net of one-offs in the three months to June, compared with $4.6bn in the same period of 2013.
Mr van Beurden spoke of his sadness about the crash of the MH17 Malaysia Airlines flight in east Ukraine earlier this month, which took the lives of four Shell employees and many of his compatriots and which he described as a terrible tragedy.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article