Support structures for the new Queensferry Crossing will not be completed until "the summer of next year", Transport Scotland has said, throwing further doubt on claims the £1.4 billion bridge project can be completed by its December 2016 deadline.
Thomas Nilsson, the construction director of the international consortium Forth Crossing Bridge Constructors, said in March last year that of the nine V-shaped piers and three 210-metre towers: "If everything goes OK, we are going to see the piers and towers ... going up this summer [2013]".
However, this target date is set to be missed by as much as two years, with three of the 50m piers (known as S1, S2 and S3) on the south side and one on the north side (N1) awaiting the completion of foundation work at or near sea level. Another (S4) is currently only half-complete.
Transport Scotland says the south- side piers will be completed and ready to support the viaduct leading on to the bridge deck "by the end of this year", and equivalent work on the north approach "by summer next year [2015]".
The delay suggests to civil engineering experts that the consortium has experienced similar problems setting the pier foundations as thosew that affected the placing of the giant steel "caisson" base of the south tower, an operation that took over a year longer than planned.
Transport Scotland's project director David Climie last year admitted that previous delays had depleted the project's "float time" - time built into the construction's "critical path" to absorb contingencies.
The Sunday Herald has previously reported doubts about the consortium's ability to make up lost time, given the unprecedented length, height, architecture and engineering challenges of the new bridge, and the works programme's vulnerability to weather conditions in the Firth of Forth.
The reports were dismissed by Transport Secretary Keith Brown MSP, who said they were "based on ill-informed speculation and a lack of understanding."
A spokesman for Transport Scotland said: "The project remains on schedule to be complete by the end of 2016".
Asked if any perceived risk of delay would immediately be made public, he said "yes".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article