Mining giant BHP Billiton has signalled its wish to spin off a chunk of the company in a demerger of assets estimated to be worth as much as 12 billion US dollars (£7.2 billion).
The group's board may announce its next move on the plans after it meets next week to hammer out the next phase of the firm's streamlining.
BHP said it wanted to concentrate on four or five major commodities - iron ore, copper, coal and petroleum and potash.
Analysts say the £44 billion firm, which is the world's largest miner by market value, will want to spin off commodities such as aluminium, manganese, and nickel, which have a lower contribution to group profit.
The giant was created out of the 2001 merger of two miners: Australia's Broken Hill Proprietary Company (BHP) and the UK's Billiton.
The move by BHP is part of a wider programme by the firm that has seen it sell off billions of assets in recent years including uranium and diamond businesses.
It is in line with the strategies of a number of global commodity groups that have shed assets to bolster profits amid a downturn in commodity prices, appeasing investors seeking higher returns.
The market expects BHP chief executive Andrew Mackenzie to report a sharp rebound in BHP's full-year profits next Tuesday, by 27% to 13.9 billion US dollars (£8.3 billion) from 12 months ago, and a possible share buyback to boost shareholder returns.
Brokers said a spin-off from BHP would be complicated as the firm is listed in London and Australia, and management would have to work out how to distribute the shares to investors evenly.
BHP said: "A demerger of a selection of assets is our preferred option. The Board expects to consider this, and other matters, when it reconvenes next week. If any material decisions are made, they will be announced immediately."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article