Most large companies believe their workers need the government's free guidance on their pension at least a year before they retire, with 57 per cent saying it should be available five or 10 years in advance, a UK-wide employer survey has found.
The government has guaranteed all retiring employees a guidance session with a non-industry body after next April, when it is scrapping the compulsion to use a personal pension pot to buy an annuity providing an income for life.
But guidance will only be available once the retiree has begun drawing a pension, not beforehand, according to the government's consultation.
Now a survey of the YouGov 250 Club of major UK employers for JLT Employee Benefits has found 30 per cent of firms believe guidance should be available between one and four years before retirement, while 39 per cent say it is needed five to 10 years ahead. Almost 20 per cent of firms say people need help more than 10 years before they retire, while only 6 per cent think the year of retirement is soon enough.
Malcolm Paul, chairman of JLT in Scotland, said: "Over 85 per cent of employers think the government's guidance needs to be well in advance."
John Wilson, head of research at JLT, which employs 200 in Edinburgh, said: "There is no free right to guidance before you take benefits. The way the consultation is written it is at the point of retirement that you have access to the guidance service."
Mr Wilson said people would also be allowed to access the service for follow-up discussions at any time, without limit, which begged questions about how the Money Advice Service, Pensions Advisory Service and Citizens Advice Bureaux would cope with demand.
"We know they are recruiting, but how do they know how many to recruit? People could go back for a review on a daily basis - we are talking about people with time on their hands."
Over 60 per cent of employers said they believed their scheme members would need guidance more than once, both before and after retirement, with 30 per cent saying the process should be completed before retirement. Although the guidance service will be limited to generic advice on possible choices, 81 per cent of employers believe their staff will still need individual advice on their retirement choices.
Perhaps due to the size of companies sampled, 63 per cent would be happy for employers to shoulder that burden, but more than half of those said only if tax relief was available on the cost. Almost 20 per cent of firms said individuals should pay for their own advice, with only 13 per cent believing taxpayers should foot the bill.
Asked whether the government is right to lift the restrictions on pension saving, 79 per cent of employers said yes, only 12 per cent saying no. But asked whether the reforms would increase pension saving in the UK, only 42 per cent of firms were convinced it would, with 34 per cent doubtful and 25 per cent undecided.
Mr Wilson said: "This is one of the major reasons for reform, but interestingly some of the economists are saying the same thing, that economically it is the correct decision but it will not actually increase the savings ratio in the UK."
On whether they believed employees would continue to buy an annuity once compulsion is scrapped, views were divided, with 41 per cent not knowing and almost 30 per cent saying between a tenth and a half of workers might still choose an annuity.
The 250 Club covers mainly private sector employers UK-wide with over 500 staff, half of them employing more than 3,000, and up to 15 per cent of them are in Scotland.
JLT employs 1,600 in the UK and its Edinburgh Park operation includes its UK customer service centre.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article