Complaints about Britain's financial firms rose eight percent in the first half of this year after a jump in new cases about packaged bank accounts, the industry's watchdog has said.
Packaged bank accounts offer a range of additional services -- such as insurance policies, better deals on savings accounts or loans, and other perks in exchange for a monthly fee.
Three major banks - Royal Bank of Scotland, Barclays and Lloyds - have already set aside £732m between them to compensate customers for possible mis-sold packaged accounts, raising concern it could build into another big compensation problem for the industry.
New complaints about payment protection insurance (PPI) products in the six months to the end of June totalled 94,091, down 10 per cent from the previous six months but still accounting for 55 per cent of all cases, the Financial Ombudsman Service said.
There was a 45 per cent jump in the number of complaints about financial products other than PPI, mainly due to more complaints about packaged bank account brought by claims management companies, the ombudsman said.
That took total new complaints in the six months to 173,994, up from 161,649 in the July to December 2014 period.
Some 57 per cent of complaints were upheld in the consumer's favour, the ombudsman said.
Banks have set aside more than £28 billion in compensation for PPI mis-selling, including £13.4bn by Lloyds Banking Group alone, making it by far the costliest scandal to hit the industry.
The number of claims is slowing, but not as fast as banks had expected.
Firms that were set up to claim and process PPI cases have now switched to claiming on packaged accounts.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here