THE family business of Scottish landowner the Duke of Buccleuch has warned that uncertainty over UK renewables policy means an “energy crisis seems inevitable”.
The commercial property to land-owning group, which is aiming to develop a 24 Megawatt (MW) wind farm on the site of the former Glenmuckloch opencast coal mine, has claimed the continually shifting policy regime around renewables makes it difficult to plan projects and attract investors.
Its warning came as Buccleuch reported that pre-tax profits had narrowed to £1.2 million from £1.7m in the year ended October 31, with turnover dropping to £45.1m from £49.8m.
Net asset value, which Buccleuch said is a more indicative measure of its performance, rose by £5.5m to £128m.
“Energy policy continues to lurch from one technology to another providing no clarity for investors to the extent that an energy crisis seems inevitable,” the company declared in its latests accounts.
Asked to build on the company’s concerns about energy policy, chief executive John Glen said: “The main thing is that the subsidy regimes have been changing all the time. This lack of transparency as to where subsidy regimes are going to go makes the development and financing of projects more difficult. That’s really what the issue is.
“Obviously, everybody is focused on the onshore wind, but of course there are other technologies, including pump storage hydro, for which there is no clarity as yet as to what, if any, subsidy regime may exist, and what mechanisms might be used.
“Everyone is anticipating that there needs to be some change, but the problem we have is that until they make up their minds, it is difficult to progress these projects.”
Buccleuch has ambitions to develop an energy park at Glenmuckloch, where a community-owned wind project is already in operation. As well as seeking planning to add a further wind farm, Buccleuch has submitted plans with venture partner 2020 Renewables for a 400MW pumped storage hydro scheme on the site.
It said 270 local construction jobs would be brought to the area over a five to seven year period if the project gets the go ahead. Buccleuch is also mulling two further potential onshore wind projects in Dumfries and Galloway.
Mr Glen said pumped storage hydro schemes have a role to play in “balancing out our energy needs”. He noted: “It is a renewable resource, and therefore it strikes me we should have it in the basket of energy production within the country. Hopefully we will see something develop that will enable us to move forward, because the impact on the local community would be massive.”
Buccleuch said the company has continued its strategy of reducing debt and re-allocating resources. It cut debt by £10.7m by reducing its exposure to commercial property, in which it sold a number of mature properties.
Mr Glen: “The commercial property business has done very well in 2014/15. We sold a number of properties which had come to maturity, [and] generated good profits.
“The challenge in commercial property now is finding the next deals. Yields have been compressed. On the other hand, on the development side, we are beginning to see a pick-up in momentum in housebuilding.”
Buccleuch said profits from disposals were reinvested during the year in its energy projects, rural portfolio and its redevelopment of Dalkeith Country Park, where it is developing a multi-million pound food, drink, retail, “wellness space” and adventure playground.
The £7m Restoration Yard, which is due to open in late July, will employ 40 staff.
Mr Glen said: “We’re hoping to attract well over 350,000 visitors to the vicinity, which has a knock-on trickle-down effect into the local community. It’s a major investment.”
During its last financial year, Buccleuch established a new holding company, The MDS Estates, to encompass all of the businesses within the Buccleuch group.
Meanwhile, Mr Glen said the referendums on first Scottish independence and now the UK’s EU membership has removed the focus from domestic policy issues. He said: “We seem to have had our eyes focused on other things for quite some time."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel