Scottish Financial Enterprise has welcomed a European move that could pave the way for UK investment managers to operate in EU markets post-Brexit.
The European Securities and Markets Authority last week announced a long-awaited decision on the extension of ‘passporting’ rights to asset managers from non-EU countries.
Those approved will be able to continue raising private equity and other non-retail funds from investors across Europe, replacing the previous system of country-by-country authorisation.
Nine out of 12 countries were deemed to have “no significant obstacles” to equivalence in their regulatory schemes, under the Alternative Investment Fund Management Directive, namely the US, Canada, Japan, Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, Switzerland, Jersey and Guernsey, though with provisos in some cases.
Lawyers said the development was positive for the UK and a possible blueprint for a post-Brexit 'equivalence' deal.
Graeme Jones, chief executive of Scottish Financial Enterprise, commented: “This is an encouraging development and one which will be taken into consideration alongside the other challenges and opportunities which leaving the EU presents the financial services industry.
“It is important that the best deal is struck, in the negotiations which lie ahead, to provide optimum access to the EU market. We would encourage negotiators to consider all options available for the UK to maintain, or regain, passporting access to the single market.”
Paula Kennedy, partner (from August 1) at Burness Paull, commented: “What could happen is that the UK could have these passports extended to it in the same way. You would hope that the UK would not be a tricky jurisdiction for ESMA to form a view on.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here