High street giant Next posted lower first half profits after seeing store sales slide and warned trading has remained "challenging and volatile".
The chain posted a 1.5% drop in pre-tax profits to £342.1 million for the six months to the end of July, dragged lower by a 16.8% tumble in earnings across its retail shops.
An impressive end of season sale performance in July helped buoy trading towards the end of the first half, but the group dashed hopes of a bounce-back in consumer spending since the EU referendum.
Chief executive Lord Wolfson said: "We do not believe that July trading represented any change in underlying consumer spending patterns.
"Trading since July, which to some extent may have been affected by the sale, has remained challenging and volatile."
He added: "It has been a challenging year so far, with economic and cyclical factors working against us, and it looks set to remain that way until mid-October at the earliest."
Lord Wolfson said the September heatwave has done little to help clothing retailers.
He said: "Consumers are only buying clothes when they need to. In this weather, no one's buying winter clothes."
The group is bracing itself for a difficult quarter to the end of October, saying it is set to be the "toughest" of the year as it comes up against tough comparatives.
But the all-important Christmas season may see some improvement after mild weather hit the end of 2015/16, according to Next.
The group also repeated warnings first made last month that it may have to hike prices by up to 5% next year to offset the sharply weaker pound since the Brexit vote, which will push up the cost of importing clothes from overseas suppliers.
Next said this could hit sales further, knocking between 0.5% and 1% off like-for-like figures.
Its gloomy comments were echoed by rival John Lewis Partnership, which posted a 14.7% slide in half-year pre-tax profits to £81.9 million, citing "deep structural changes in the retail market".
John Lewis chairman Sir Charlie Mayfield said it was not as a result of the EU referendum, but "far-reaching changes taking place in society, in retail and in the workplace".
Next has been cautioning over retail prospects for a number of months, warning of a consumer spending shift away from clothing.
It said in March that consumers were instead splashing out on eating out and travel, warning the current financial year was set to be its worst since the financial crisis.
But Lord Wolfson has said there has been no clear evidence of a worsening in trading directly as a result of the referendum decision.
In an update last month, Next surprised the market with a better-than-feared second quarter performance, with a robust end-of-season sale helping limit the fall in total high street store sales, including markdowns, to 0.7%.
Over the half-year, full-price sales were 4% lower, while total retail sales were down by 0.7%.
The group nudged up its full-year profit forecast in August, to a mid-point of £810 million from the £800 million previously guided.
Shares in Next dropped 5% after its interim results.
George Salmon, equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: "Next's results show in real time the changing habits of the UK consumer.
"With its stores reporting falling sales, Next is dependent on the online Directory business for growth. Unfortunately, as competition intensifies online, their Directory division has come under pressure too, meaning the shares have spent 2016 going backwards."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here