HEAVY exposure to domestically focused UK companies and housebuilders in particular have had a detrimental effect on the Independent Investment Trust, which is currently bottom of the Association of Investment Companies’ global sector thanks to its 2016 performance.
The trust, which as its name suggests is independent from any fund house but is run by former Baillie Gifford manager Max Ward, made a net asset value total return of five per cent in the year to the end of November while its benchmark indices, the FTSE All Share and FTSE World, made respective total returns of 9.8 per cent and 25.6 per cent.
Mr Ward said that stockmarket panic following the Brexit vote led to around 40 per cent being wiped off the prices of most of the trust’s housebuilding holdings, which collectively account for just under a quarter of the portfolio.
“The scale of our existing position in the industry made us slow to capitalise on the eye-catching values thrown up by the panic, but we did eventually add £3.4 million to our Redrow holding,” he said.
“This had a mitigating influence on a most disappointing overall performance [but] despite the addition, the value of our stake declined from £56.5m at 30 November 2015 to £51m at 30 November 2016.”
Despite the poor performance, trust chairman Douglas McDougall said the trust had returned 476 per cent since launch in 2000.
He added that the total dividend for the 2015/16 year would fall by just 0.5p, from 8p to 7.5p. That is made up of an interim payment of 5p and a special payment of 2.5p.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here