The board of troubled toymaker Hornby has backed its chairman and is now urging shareholders to vote against proposals that would force Roger Canham to step down.
New Pistoia, Hornby's second biggest shareholder with a 20% holding, is pushing the firm to replace Mr Canham with Alexander Anton - a fellow shareholder and non-executive director of Victoria Carpets.
Directors have now been forced to hold a general meeting for shareholders to vote on New Pistoia's demands on May 16.
But the directors say the resolutions are "not in the best interests of the company or its shareholders as a whole" and "unanimously recommend" that shareholders vote against the proposals.
The board said: "The strategy currently being pursued by the board is well thought-out and is working; the current structure and composition of the board is consistent with good corporate governance, and the board has the support of a majority of its shareholders."
The votes will be binding, but will require a simple majority of over 50% to pass.
However, Hornby said a consultation found that shareholders including Phoenix Asset Management Partners Limited, Ruffer LLP and Downing LLP - which together represent a 53.96% stake - intend to vote against the proposals.
Mr Anton and New Pistoia lodged their demands earlier this month, saying the company's current strategy is "ineffective", "will continue to destroy value" and is "not aligned with creating wealth for all shareholders".
They added that Hornby has lost £31 million after five years under Mr Canham's leadership.
A string of profit warnings has resulted in Hornby's shares plummeting over the past year as the firm has struggled with falling sales.
But the Scalextric-to-Airfix firm, best known for its model railways, has embarked on a painful turnaround which has seen it reduce product ranges and cut back on investment as part of plans to shore up the balance sheet.
In early April, Hornby said it was starting to see early signs of recovery as the first stage of its turnaround plan - which saw it restructure its UK and European operations - come to a close.
Hornby shares were down over 1% in mid-morning trading.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here