Carillion continued its pursuit of merger target Balfour Beatty today as it highlighted the "powerful" financial benefits arising from a £3 billion tie-up.
The support services firm also revealed it has been in talks with Balfour's major shareholders after two proposals to the company's board were rejected.
It has sweetened its offer by promising to pay an additional 8.5p a share dividend to Balfour investors and told them the creation of a new FTSE 100 company will result in £175 million a year in cost savings by 2016.
Carillion will also refocus Balfour's troubled UK construction services business on a smaller number of contracts so that two-thirds of group profits will come from services and investments with one third from construction.
The company said: "Carillion continues to believe in the powerful strategic logic and financial benefits of a merger with Balfour Beatty and is therefore continuing to consider its position."
Carillion also issued half-year results in which it said pre-tax profits rose by 5% to £67.5 million, helped by progress in rescaling its own UK construction arm.
Balfour revealed on Monday that executive chairman Steve Marshall met Carillion counterpart Philip Green for talks a week ago following the rejection of an earlier proposal.
But the potential tie-up continues to founder on Carillion's wish to cancel Balfour's planned £200 million sale of its US business Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Balfour said its current plan to refocus and simplify the group "remains the most attractive option". However, half-year results this week showed underlying pre-tax profits fell by 53% to £22 million, while losses in construction services widened to £69 million due to previously reported UK issues.
Carillion said today that the £175 million a year of savings will come from back and head office functions as well as from applying Carillion's business operating model to Balfour Beatty's UK business.
It disclosed the content of its meetings with Balfour shareholders following a request from the UK Takeover Panel.
Shares in Carillion and Balfour Beatty were both higher today.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article