The government has missed an opportunity to boost automatic enrolment into pensions at work, industry experts have said, after pensions minister Steve Webb said restrictions on Nest, the default scheme set up by government, would remain until 2017.
Mr Webb said the contribution limit into Nest of £4500 a year, along with the ban on inward transfers from other schemes, would not be scrapped for another four years.
It means companies will eventually be freed up to choose Nest as the single scheme for all employees, in a move fiercely opposed by leading pension companies including Edinburgh-based Aegon and Scottish Life.
Joanne Segars, chief executive of the National Association of Pension Funds, said Nest had an important role to play in making auto-enrolment a success.
She said: "There might have been a case for lifting these barriers earlier, but doing so from 2017 provides the clarity and certainty that employers, savers and the pensions market all need."
She added: "Employers will be able to treat Nest like any other pension on the market, and savers will be able to pool their small pension pots into a simpler and bigger fund."
But former government adviser Dr Ros Altmann said the government "seems to have bowed to industry pressure" by delaying the changes.
She said: "The private pensions industry has already managed to prevent Nest from winning some of the most profitable pensions business."
By 2017 most attractive employer business will have chosen other schemes. The longer the restrictions remain, the less business NEST will attract, because once employers have already chosen a scheme for their auto-enrolment duties, they will be less likely to want to move to NEST later."
Tom McPhail, at brokers Hargreaves Lansdown, said: "It never made much sense to have a set of rules which were peculiar to one particular pension scheme."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article