CLYDESDALE Bank chief executive David Thorburn has seen his pay cut by more than half to £510,000 despite being promoted to the top job after the bank was buffeted by loan losses.
The figures, which were revealed in accounts for the 12 months to September 30, lay bare the pummelling the bank has taken this year with statutory pre-tax losses coming in at £614 million following £737m of loan impairments.
Clydesdale had previously revealed it made a £183m pre-tax operating loss on an accounting basis that excluded a number of non-cash items.
Mr Thorburn was chief operating officer of Clydesdale, which is owned by National Australia Bank, until July 2011 when he replaced Lynne Peacock.
His earnings for the 2012 financial year are one-third of the £1.5m banked by Ms Peacock for working nine months of 2011, though her package included a £475,000 termination payment.
In that year Mr Thorburn received £1.2m, most of it from incentive schemes.
In fact, for the 2012 financial year Mr Thorburn was not the bank's highest paid employee.
John Hooper, an executive responsible for back-office services, received £918,000, 80% more than Mr Thorburn. Before joining Clydesdale in 2009 Mr Hooper used to run NAB's global institutional business (nabCapital). His current basic salary is £703,000, topped up with £214,000 of benefits and allowances.
Mr Thorburn, has a £400,000 basic package and receives £109,000 of benefits.
It is further evidence of how the role of chief executive has changed.
In July NAB chief executive Cameron Clyne became executive chairman of Clydesdale, in place of non-executive Sir Malcolm Williamson.
A Clydesdale spokesman said: "Directors' remuneration is very closely linked to business performance and we've been clear that's not where it needs to be. As a result, no annual pay rises will be awarded to the senior management team in the year ahead.
"Given the significant challenges facing our business, it is also only right that no STI (short-term incentive) bonus payments were awarded to directors for the past financial year."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article