Mecca parent Rank Group revealed half-year earnings slumped by nearly a quarter after its bingo halls suffered a 10% fall in visitors amid a continuing squeeze on household incomes.
The group, which also operates Grosvenor Casinos, said revenues in the six months to the end of December were hit further by the hot weather in July.
Pre-tax profits fell 23% to £27.7 million after earnings plunged 38% at Mecca and 26% at its Grosvenor chain.
Chief executive Ian Burke said: "The very challenging bingo market has contributed to a decline in the Mecca brand's performance."
The group estimated the slump in Mecca admissions alone translated to a £4.6 million decline in Rank operating profits, the bulk of a £5.5 million decline overall.
Revenue at bingo halls dropped by 7% on a like-for-like basis, with customer visits down from 6.86 million to 6.21 million.
The 10% fall was "due to the general pressure on our customers' discretionary expenditures and the impact of the hot July weather", the group said.
Digital customer visits were down by 5%, and revenues by 2% though within this, mobile revenues surged by 24%.
The group said it was trying to stabilise and rebuild the performance of its bingo halls through improving value and restricting spending to essential works, as well as continuing to lobby for a cut in bingo duty.
Meanwhile, Grosvenor Casinos saw overall revenues increase by 34% after the acquisition of 19 venues from Gala in May.
However, like-for-like turnover was down 9%, after a weak London performance and the hot summer.
The group said operating profit in the second half of the year was expected to be flat on a year earlier, after trading in the first four weeks of January was in line with expectations and showed an improvement over the first half.
Rank said the performance of its businesses in the "challenging" recent period had been expected.
But analysts at Panmure Gordon said it was "a disappointing set of results".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article