EDINBURGH Worldwide Investment Trust has cited a "seemingly indiscriminate" sell-off in technology and biotechnology stocks during the spring as a key factor in its under-performance of its benchmark index during its financial year to October 31.
The trust, which had shareholders funds of £206 million at its year-end and is managed by Edinburgh-based investment house Baillie Gifford, said yesterday that its net asset value per share had fallen by 2.7 per cent during the 12 months to October.
Its benchmark index, calculated using the MSCI All Countries World Index until January 31 and the S&P Citigroup Global Small Cap Index thereafter, rose by 1.1 per cent in sterling terms during the year to October 31.
Edinburgh Worldwide's remit was broadened in January, with shareholder approval, to enable it to invest in smaller, less mature companies.
In his statement on the results, trust chairman David Reid says: "Although the reorganised portfolio initially performed well, absolute and relative performance were impacted negatively during March and April due to a seemingly indiscriminate sell-off in technology and biotech stocks, an area of the market to which the portfolio is exposed."
He noted that, in the second half of the financial year, Edinburgh Worldwide's net asset value had risen by 11.6 per cent, ahead of a 4.3 per cent increase in its benchmark.
The managers of Edinburgh Worldwide highlight encouraging developments at several healthcare companies in its portfolio, including newly-listed UK biotech 4D Pharma and Boston-based Alnylam.
However, they add: "Disappointingly, several...holdings suffered share-price falls during the sell-off in growth and technology shares that occurred in March and April; this included online grocer Ocado and cloud-based accounting software company, Xero."
Edinburgh Worldwide declared an unchanged final dividend of 1.5p-a-share. This makes a total dividend for the financial year of 2p-a-share, matching the payout for the prior 12 months.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article