THE biggest listed water company in the UK is aiming to enter the Scottish business supply market, becoming the fourth big English player to apply for a licence this year.
United Utilities, based in Warrington, supplies water and sewage services to about seven million people and firms in northwest England.
Its application comes on the back of similar moves by Thames Water, Severn Trent and Veolia over the past few months, in a sign the Scottish market to supply water and sewerage to businesses is finally hotting up, four years after private companies were permitted to compete against Scottish Water subsidiary, BusinessStream.
Until this year, deregulation had attracted only a couple of players such as Osprey Water and Aimera, who are thought to have very small market shares. Most of the big utilities felt it was not worth moving into Scotland while there was no free market south of the Border.
This is now set to change . The sudden influx of applicants to Scotland coincides with reforms that are working their way through the UK Parliament that will let water companies compete with each other for business services the length of the country.
Opponents of utility competition and privatisation in Scotland fear these moves will culminate in full open competition in the domestic market. This would complete a process that the Thatcher administration felt was too politically controversial in the 1980s.
United Utilities was formed from the 1995 merger of North West Water and Norweb. Recently tipped as a candidate for a possible £6 billion takeover by sovereign wealth funds or private equity groups, it does not currently trade in Scotland in any capacity.
A spokeswoman said: "It is still very early days in relation to supply competition and at this point we have not announced any plans for operating outside our region. You should certainly not read into this application any specific plans."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article