Fitness First said work to upgrade its gym venues is already starting to pay off as it vowed to speed up the refit scheme despite a hefty year-end loss.
Restructuring costs in the wake of its rescue by a distressed debt specialist two years ago helped it make a £61 million pre-tax loss for 2013, even as new-look health clubs pulled in more members.
But Fitness First chief executive Andy Cosslett said a strong performance from the rebranded clubs and its growth potential in Asia, where it opened seven new clubs over the year, will see it stabilise towards the end of 2014.
"It's about shifting the pendulum back to growth," he said in an interview with The Times.
"New clubs are going up, but the uninvested clubs are still going backwards. Until we fix those, they're going to continue to drag us back."
Revenues slipped 13% to £511.4 million for the year to the end of October as the group cut its worldwide portfolio of clubs by 70 to 335. It has shed almost half of the 153 clubs it had in the UK, where revenues fell by £42 million to £85 million.
However, backed by its new shareholder Oaktree Capital Management, Fitness First said it will invest £101 million in upgrading 108 clubs this year, after spending around £75 million in 2013 on refits including new equipment and smarter changing rooms.
The gym chain has so far seen most of the fruits of its labour in London, where in the last five months re-branded clubs have pulled in 28% and 25% more new starters in South Kensington and Tottenham Court Road, respectively.
It now operates 79 clubs in UK, which has seen a 15% jump in joiners in the five months to March overall, compared with last year, resulting in 10,000 more members.
According to a study by Deloitte, the fitness sector in the country is set to grow by 2.1% a year until 2018, bringing in 800,000 fitness conscious gym goers.
But Fitness First is seeing more near term joy in Asia, where revenues shot up 9.8% on the year to reach £136 million. Adjusting operating profit in the region increased 14.5% to £20.5 million.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article