ANTRIM Energy has provided encouragement for small oil and gas firms by moving into profit after suffering hefty losses last year when it hit big problems in the North Sea.
The company made a $930,000 (£597,000) profit from operations in the second quarter after starting production off the UK, where it has been grappling with soaring costs amid fierce competition from bigger fish.
The Canadian independent hopes to make further progress this year on two fields east of Shetland that are now in production and on its exploration acreage offshore Ireland.
However, it noted: "There are a number of material uncertainties that raise significant doubts as to the company's ability to continue as a going concern."
The issues highlighted in its quarterly results announcement provide a checklist of areas in which oil and gas firms could face challenges. Antrim said the uncertainties include "the performance of the producing wells, oil prices, ability to finish the planned development program for Causeway within budget, ability to secure additional financing, relinquishment of commitments on certain licences and settlement of contingencies".
It added: "The oil and natural gas industry is intensely competitive and the company competes with a large number of companies that have greater resources."
The comments will be studied with interest in Scotland, which is reaping the rewards from booming investment in the North Sea. Majors including BP are developing bumper new fields in areas like west of Shetland to capitalise on strong demand for oil and gas. Their activity is stoking competition for resources such as rigs and skilled staff.
Founded in the 1990s, Antrim has acquired interests in a range of UK licences. However, the company's experience underlines how difficult firms may find it to turn exploration interests into producing assets.
Antrim made a $135m loss in 2012 after recording a $123m impairment charge against the value of its oil and gas interests.
This included a $50m provision against the valuation of the company's interest in the Ffion field in the North Sea.
Antrim decided expected costs associated with its development had risen so much the project no longer met its economic criteria.
Antrim also provided $54.7m against the valuation of the Fyne field and related interests. This followed a substantial increase in the projected capital costs of developing the field using a Floating Production Storage and Offloading Vessel. After recording $17m oil sales income in the first half of 2013, compared with none in the preceding two years, things may be looking up for Antrim. It expects increased production from the Causeway field in the second half, following deployment of a specialised pump. Antrim's share of production from the field averaged 668 barrels of oil per day in the second quarter. It has a 35.5% interest. Ithaca Energy has 64.5%.
Antrim expects an appraisal well to be drilled on Cormorant East, which came onstream in January. It will share in revenues when its portion of relevant costs has been recovered.
It also agreed with Enegi Oil and ABT Technology to investigate plans to bring Fyne onstream with unmanned buoys.
In April, the company sold a 75% stake in a licence it has in the Porcupine Basin area off Ireland, to Kosmos Energy. The firms are acquiring 3D seismic data on the licence.A spokesman for Antrim did not elaborate on the results.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article