Royal Bank of Scotland, the world's biggest bank six years ago, continues to slide down the global league as Chinese banks power ahead, according to The Banker's latest ranking of Top 1000 banks.
RBS was in 53 countries with 200,000 employees in 2009, and claimed to be biggest by size. It has now slipped from 15th to 18th in the table, which is measured on financial strength.
Restructuring helped weigh other UK banks too, with HSBC falling from fifth place to ninth, and Barclays from 12th to 13th.
Brian Caplen, editor of The Banker, said: "At one time several UK banks were among a handful of truly global players. But since the financial crisis they have reduced their scope and are focussing on a fewer areas in a bid to restore profitability. We may have seen the end of the UK-based global bank."
By contrast, UK banks which focus only on the domestic market are holding steady - Lloyds stayed in 22nd position and Nationwide rose from 119 to 105.
Chinese banks continue to improve their position. ICBC, with whom Standard Life has a partnership, topped the ranking for the third year in a row and China has three other banks in the top six. China Construction Bank held onto second place, Bank of China moved from seventh to fourth, and Agricultural Bank of China from ninth to sixth.
Chinese banks were also the most profitable, collectively making 1.75 times the amount US banks make and almost 10 times UK profits. In 2008 UK banks made more than Chinese banks.
Profits and returns at UK banks are slowly recovering although they are still only a third of their peak performance in 2007. Return on capital is 7.31per cent - against 4.61per cent for eurozone banks more than doubling their profits
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article