ROYAL Bank of Scotland, Lloyds, HSBC and Barclays are facing around £19 billion of conduct and litigation charges over the next two years, according to a report from Standard & Poor's (S&P).
The research said the big four banks have already incurred £42bn of charges over the past five years, the vast majority of the £48bn paid out by the industry as a whole.
The researchers believe claims for the mis-selling of payment protection insurance have probably peaked while compensation for mis-sold complex business loans, where £5bn has been paid out since 2012, is also expected to reduce to a "modest" level.
PPI has so far cost the banks more than £26 billion with S&P factoring in a further £5bn over the next two years.
But the ratings agency warns of "material" charges for investment banking related litigation charges this year.
Among the active investigations are probes into the rigging of foreign exchange markets and possible breaches of anti-money laundering controls.
The S&P research suggests the banks have enough capital to cope with any fines and said the industry is making "substantial strides" to make sure products being sold today do not lead to problems in the future.
It argued sales practices are less aggressive and focused on the short term, banks are providing more evidence about customer care and many chief compliance officers are reporting directly to chief executives.
The report said: "While such developments are good examples of progress, we believe that they cannot on their own mitigate against mis-selling or conduct risk; the fundamental changes in culture being enacted will take many years to permeate through all areas of large and complex banking groups."
Separately, RBS has agreed to sell a tranche of North American loans worth around £3.7 billion to Mizuho Financial Group.
It marks the second such transaction between the two banks in recent months. In February Japanese firm Mizuho bought around £5bn of US and Canadian loans from RBS.
RBS said the latest portfolio it is selling made a profit in the region of £13 million during 2014.It expects to receive cash of £330 million as part of the deal but said that would generate a loss on disposal of £20m.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article