MARINE Harvest lost money on one measure on the salmon it produced in Scotland in the last quarter of 2014, after facing challenges.
The Norwegian company said salmon of Scottish origin achieved operational earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) of -3.42 Norwegian Krone per kilo (30p). Salmon from Norway achieved EBIT of NOK 12.59 per kilo.
Steve Bracken, business support manager at Marine Harvest Scotland, said: " In comparison with the rest of the year the last quarter of 2014 was challenging for us, mainly due to algal blooms, Amoebic Gill Disease (AGD) and sea lice which led to increased mortality and higher costs. "
He added: "Going forward into 2015 we continue to focus on our wrasse breeding site at Macrihanish in Argyll. Greater use of these fish, also known as "cleaner fish", will help us tackle the challenge of sea lice. In addition, we continue to develop and improve our farming practices and technology to help mitigate the effects of these biological challenges including AGD."
With 46 farms in Northern and Western Scotland, Marine Harvest says it is the largest salmon farming company in Scotland.
Marine Harvest Group reported record operational revenues of NOK 6.8 billion in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared with NOK 6.7bn in the same period of 2013.
The group achieved an operational EBIT of NOK 1bn in the fourth quarter of 2014, in line with the corresponding quarter of 2013.
Chief executive Alf-Helge Aarsko said the group had delivered a strong operational result in the fourth quarter.
The group also has operations in Canada and Chile, where it is set to expand.
Salmon from Canada and Chile achieved EBIT of 3.69 NOK and 0.35 NOK per kilo respectively in the fourth quarter.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article