Soapworks, the UK's leading soap maker and a significant employer at Easterhouse in Glasgow, tumbled into losses last year and increased its debt.
An operating and pre-tax profit of £661,759 in 2011 slid to a loss of £162,863 in 2012, on turnover up from £11.97 million to £12.25m, according to accounts filed at Companies House.
But employee numbers crept up from 100 to 102, and the community-based business actually increased its contributions to local charities last year from £18,490 to £22,757.
The accounts show net debt rising from £1.03m to £1.67m, with Barclays Bank taking out a floating charge as bank loans rose from nil to £322,716.
The directors, led by controlling shareholder Jan Zadruzynski, write in the annual report: "Trading results were lower than expectations but were on the back of a difficult period with increasing raw material costs, and the integration of many new products and customers as a result of the acquisition in 2011."
The business acquired Standard Soaps soon after Mr Zadruzynski led a management buy-out from L'Oreal in November 2010.
Soapworks was set up in 1988 by the late Body Shop founder Dame Anita Roddick, who was involved in charitable projects around the world and had taken up a challenge to do something to help the employment blackspot of Easterhouse.
A £1m investment created jobs for 14 mainly unemployed people, since when Soapworks has grown to become the UK's biggest soap manufacturer, supplying high street retailers in the UK and exporting to continental Europe, Canada, Russia and China.
Mr Zadruzynski, an original employee and managing director since 1999, has a 51% stake with 42% held by directors and managers and 7% by other staff.
Remuneration of the highest-paid director, assumed to be Mr Zadruzynski, was static at £108,728.
Shareholder funds slipped from £532,922 to £445,691.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article