THE chairman of Standard Life defended the company's executive pay policies in the face of a significant protest by investors and signalled that it would consider buying Scottish Widows if its rival is put up for sale.
Gerry Grimstone mounted a spirited defence of the boardroom pay practices at Edinburgh-based Standard Life in advance of a general meeting which featured a big protest vote on the issue.
Some 11.5% of votes cast by shareholders including institutions opposed approval of the directors’ remuneration report for 2010.
This showed that the life and pensions giant’s boardroom pay bill totalled £5.576m, including £2.8m bonuses but excluding conditional awards made under the Long Term Incentive Plan. David Nish, who became chief executive last year, earned £1.97m including a £1.1m bonus.
By contrast, in 1995 one of his predecessors Scott Bell earned £342,000 including a £51,000 bonus. In 2009, directors received pay and benefits worth £5.8m including bonuses totalling £2.9m.
A prominent corporate governance watchdog, PIRC, had recommended that shareholders oppose the 2010 report.
“We consider that combined bonus and share incentive awards made during the year were excessive,” it said. The organisation questioned the suitability of the revised performance conditions that apply to LTIP awards. A spokesman for PIRC said the “oppose” on the Standard Life remuneration report was double the average recorded in respect of a member of the blue chip FTSE-100 index last year.
However, asked to comment on PIRC’s criticisms, Mr Grimstone told The Herald: “I don’t think there’s a company in the country who PIRC wouldn’t find something wrong with their remuneration report and that’s PIRC’s prerogative to do that.
“We have a very independent remuneration committee and the job of the committee is to make sure that we pay our people fairly and we incentivise them to produce profits for shareholders and to work hard and we don’t spend a penny more on that than we need to.”
Pressed to respond to the claim that rewards were excessive, Mr Grimstone said: “We pay the absolute least that we need to in order to have the right people working for us ... We’re not doing anybody a service, our shareholders, our customers, our staff, if we don’t employ the right people.”
Mr Grimstone told the meeting that Standard Life has been making excellent progress under David Nish, who has completed one year of a three-year programme of change intended to position the company to achieve long-term growth.
There was no sign of unease about pay or strategic matters among the 100 or so investors at the thinly-attended AGM.
Asked by The Herald whether Standard Life would consider bidding for Scottish Widows should it be put up for sale by Lloyds Banking Group, Mr Grimstone said: “I can’t say... We’re perfectly happy as we are at the moment. Obviously, if any opportunity comes up we look at it but it’s nothing that we are engaged on at the moment because it’s not for sale yet.”
Regarding whether Standard Life might buy in the UK, Mr Grimstone said: “We always said we don’t close our minds to acquisition... Where we think there’s something to buy which adds on to our company, we do that.”
He distinguished the company from others that focus on achieving returns by consolidating different firms, saying: “There’s other people in the sector who make their living out of acquisitions: we’re not that, we run our business as is.”
However, he added: “If something comes up, you look at it. We have no kind of prejudgment about whether things like that would suit us or not.”
This suggests Standard Life is open-minded about bidding for Scottish Widows, although the prospect that big job losses would result in the enlarged business would concern politicians.
Mr Grimstone said he would give similar answers in respect of the Scottish Equitable business, which some sector watchers believe Aegon may offload.
A former senior Whitehall civil servant, Mr Grimstone said the Scottish National Party had won a momentous victory in the recent Scottish Parliament elections.
Asked whether Standard Life might think about leaving Scotland if the SNP Government introduced separate tax rates in Scotland, he said: “It would be wrong to single any one thing out. Whatever comes forward we will look at it and see what’s in our interests, as you would expect us to. That’s not just narrow self interest, it’s what’s in the interests of the shareholders, the customers and the employees.”
Noting that Standard Life is based in Scotland for pragmatic as well as historic reasons, he advised the SNP Government to engage with business.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article