A £50 million Treasury grant for rail sleeper services, currently loaned to Scottish Water, should be used by the Scottish Government to fund its own wish list of "shovel-ready", projects the STUC has said.
Comments by Stephen Boyd, assistant secretary of the STUC, have added to pressure on the Scottish Government to reverse a decision, revealed by The Herald in February, to deposit cash for Caledonian Sleeper investment with the quango, pending an investable rail project.
The call came as it was revealed last week that the Scottish Government underspent its 2011-12 cash budget by £79 million. The figure, which compares to last year's £12m underspend, is a dramatic reversal of Finance Secretary John Swinney's previous success in aligning resources with economy-boosting projects in a downturn.
Swinney announced last week that last year's excess cash would go towards this year's £105m spending programme including renewables, regeneration and housing, a process he described as "accelerating [a] programme of capital investment". The new list omits any of the projects previously identified as being "shovel ready".
While stressing the importance of eventual investment in the Sleeper programme, Boyd said: "Given the current state of the economy the STUC believes it is necessary to maximise government spend in the here and now, preferably on job-creating investments.
"The STUC firmly believes that the lessons of economic history are unequivocal: government spending is required to get the economy moving. Spending on infrastructure makes sense: this provides employment today while expanding the economy's long-term capacity for growth. Spending on infrastructure will be tolerated by markets in a way that social spending (if it embeds future spending commitments) might not be. So, yes, spending on 'shovel-ready' projects makes sense in current circumstances."
Questioned over its choice of spending targets, the Scottish Government initially told the Sunday Herald that "the Treasury stipulated the conditions for use of this money and that it was specifically for the Sleeper services so could not be spent on shovel ready projects".
However, a Treasury spokesman disputed this, saying: "At the Autumn Statement the UK Government made available £50m to co-fund the refurbishment of the Caledonian Sleeper service. It was agreed that the Scottish Government was free to spend this on whatever capital projects it chose in 2011-12 providing that £50m was used to support the Sleeper in the long term."
The Scottish Government has not challenged the Treasury version, nor has it provided an explanation of why, if short term spending of the £50m on infrastructure were forbidden, it transferred the funds to an infrastructure quango.
Gavin Brown MSP, Conservative finance spokesman, said: "The words and actions of this SNP government are simply not in tune. On a weekly basis they demand more money for 'shovel-ready' projects. Yet an extra £50m from the UK Government went straight to Scottish Water instead. On top of this we learned this week that the Scottish Government had £79m for the financial year 2011-12 that they were incapable of spending. The unplanned underspend was six-and-a-half times larger than the previous year – why did this not go on 'shovel-ready' projects? When all is said and done with the SNP, more is usually said than done."
In February, The Herald revealed that Swinney had moved the Sleeper cash to Scottish Water's investment programme as part of the 2011-12 Spring Budget Revision. Questioned in the Scottish Parliament over the unannounced move, described by opposition MSPs as "lacking transparency", Swinney confirmed that he had not considered spending the money on shovel-ready projects. He said: "The mechanism that I chose for deploying the resources enabled me to have the flexibility to draw the resources back out, given the overall financial commitments that the Government has given to Scottish Water over a five-year period." In fact, the cash is not fully recoverable from Scottish Water until 2014-15.
A senior civil servant familiar with the budget process told the Sunday Herald that Swinney was "taking rather unconvincing refuge" in the argument that £50m could be hard to recoup from future budgets. "Obviously, the capital budget has to be managed and its difficult to predict precisely, but £50m is not a huge amount, and compatible with the kinds of uncertainty they are used to managing. It doesn't feel to me like a very convincing explanation."
A Scottish Government spokesman said: "The fluctuations and nature of the overall Scottish Government capital budget means that if we had spent the money on shovel-ready projects in 2011-12 it could not have been guaranteed this would create the £50m of headroom in our future capital programme that would be needed to support the sleeper service, which we support, and met the Treasury's funding stipulations."
Last month, the Road Haulage Association in Scotland, representing around 1000 Scottish businesses, demanded that the Treasury cash be spent on the £35m roads component of the shovel-ready list.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article