SVM Asset Management is a business in transition its founder and chief executive Colin McLean has said as the Scottish investment house slumped to a £1.7 million pre-tax loss for last year.
Accounts obtained for the prominent Edinburgh funds boutique, revealed that turnover had plunged by 32% to £3.5m during the 2012 calendar year.
This the company blamed in part on the loss of revenue from its £60m SVM UK Active Fund after the investment trust's liquidation in the summer of 2011 following a hostile takeover by Alaska-based investor Stewart Horejsi's Cyrun vehicle.
Its 2013 performance is also likely to be muted after SVM saw the £111m SVM Global investment trust defect to Henderson Global Investors earlier this year.
Mr McLean said of 2012: "It is fair to say it was tough and we are repositioning the business and have been over the last year and are still doing that now."
SVM's operating loss for the year widened from £55,000 for 2011 to £1.6m due to the fall in income.
Mr McLean said the focus of the firm he founded in 1990 is now on open-ended funds, noting that investments trusts, of which SVM still has one, are expensive for a funds house to administer.
He said that its repositioning has led to a 21% rise in fund inflows year-on-year.
"There are steady fund inflows there," he said. "We expect over the next year that will replace the earnings and assets that we need."
SVM's troubles in the investment trust market have seen its assets under management fall to £450m. This compares to close to £700m just two years ago.
Mr McLean said that the SVM World Equity fund run by fellow director Neil Veitch had been particularly successful in attracting assets. However, it was still worth just £16.7m at the end of July, according to the latest figures from SVM.
Mr McLean said that the £82.3m UK Growth fund run by his SVM co-founder and partner Margaret Lawson had also been selling well.
But he acknowledged that whatever the success of its repositioning, earnings for 2013 will be affected by the loss of its two main investment trusts.
"It won't come through this year," he said of SVM's reshaping.
SVM, which was previously called Scottish Value, will remain focused on managing equity mandates, Mr McLean said.
He insisted that there is still a place for smaller funds houses in a UK funds space dominated by large institutions.
"Clients benefit as long as we are delivering a service for them and they have achieved good performances in the short and long term," he said.
He believes that medium-sized firms get squeezed between the smaller specialists, such as SVM, and the might of the bigger houses.
"We are quite a focused business," he said, noting its focus on UK, global and European equity mandates.
"We are not trying to cover the waterfront in asset classes," he added.
He maintained SVM has a good balance sheet as it invests its own assets through its Highlander hedge fund and vehicles such as SVM's UK Emerging Fund, which does not show in its profit and loss accounts.
SVM's accounts for 2012 showed that investments held by the group, largely listed shares, fell from £9.3m to £7.7m during the year.
Net assets dropped from £21.5m to £18m last year, the accounts revealed, while net cash at the house fell from £12.5m to £9.3m.
SVM's directors said in their report attached to the accounts: "With shareholders' funds of £17,986,000 at 31 December 2012, the group remains in a strong position to face the future."
The bulk of SVM's shares are owned by Mr McLean and Ms Lawson although other staff members, of which there was an average of 25 last year, also own shares.
The company paid a £20,000 dividend last year.
The highest paid director, which is assumed to be Mr McLean, received emoluments of £182,000, up £10,000 on 2011.
SVM recently signed a deal with State Street to consolidate all of its UK-based fund administration activities including global custody and investment accounting.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article