VIRGIN Money has priced its initial public offering at the lower end of expectations with its shares starting conditional trading on the London Stock Exchange at 283p.
That values the bank at around £1.25 billion, much lower than the initial £2bn figure which had been suggested.
However, unlike other companies, it has managed to complete its flotation in spite of the choppy financial markets. Fellow challenger bank Aldermore was among those which withdrew IPO plans, while Miller Homes was another which abandoned its listing.
Virgin Money said it expects to raise between £312 million and £344m through the flotation. It will receive £150m of that to help grow its share of the mortgage and credit card markets.
Around £162m will be shared between Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Financial Investments, funds managed by WL Ross & Co, Stanhope Investments and members of senior management at Virgin Money as they sell shares.
Following the sale, Virgin Financial Investments will retain around 34 per cent of the ordinary shares in Virgin Money with the WL Ross & Co funds holding 33 per cent.
Staff at the bank, including 200 in Scotland, are being given £1,000 of shares.
Jayne-Anne Gadhia, chief executive, said: "Our capability to deliver growth at meaningful scale, the quality of our balance sheet and the fact that we are unburdened by legacy issues makes us stand apart from other banks. These strengths give us the potential to deliver on-going returns through both capital growth and progressive dividend payments."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article