Standard Life, a critic of pay excesses in the banks, has come under fire from corporate governance watchdog Pirc for its own executive rewards.
Pirc highlighted the £3.7 million package for Keith Skeoch, chief executive of Standard Life Investments, which holds 3% of the UK stock market and monitors executive pay.
In an alert published ahead of Standard’s annual meeting in Edinburgh on May 17, Pirc says: “We consider that combined bonus and share incentive awards made during the year were excessive. In particular, combined awards made to Mr Skeoch amounted to over 750% of his salary.”
Mr Skeoch was again Standard’s best-paid director last year. His salary rose by 21% to £425,000, his first rise in five years.
But other benefits and a bonus of £1.4m took his total remuneration to £1.9m, on a par with chief executive David Nish and slightly below his haul of £2.1m in 2009.
Mr Skeoch’s award of 825,000 shares during the year under two incentive schemes outstripped Mr Nish’s award and took the total value of his package to up to £3.7m (at current share values).
Pirc said that during 2010 Standard Life had decided to base performance conditions for its long-term incentive plan (LTIP) solely on IFRS operating profits, rather than also using total shareholder return.
“We view the reversion to a sole performance target as a retrograde step,” Pirc says.
The separate Standard Life Investments LTIP was linked to investment performance and third-party business EBIT (earnings), paying the minimum for hitting 60% of target and the maximum for hitting 140% of target.
“The company does not disclose the specific EBIT hurdles, we cannot therefore independently assess whether the targets can be considered sufficiently challenging,” Pirc says. “We recommend shareholders oppose the remuneration report.”
A Standard Life spokesperson commented: “In order to support the revised strategic direction of the group, we have made changes to executive remuneration and have consulted extensively with key shareholders on this topic.
“The changes demonstrate that we set very stretching targets for our executive team and strengthen the link between performance, reward and strategy,” the spokesperson added.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article