PLANS to subsidise air routes from Scotland's secondary airports have been dropped in favour of a wider scheme to benefit the sector, the Sunday Herald has learned.
Airports including Aberdeen, Inverness and Prestwick had been set to benefit from a multi-million-pound Scottish Enterprise (SE) fund that would have paid airlines 30% of the start-up costs for short-haul flights to equivalent European airports for the first three years of the route. SE had devised the scheme as a means of getting around the European state aid rules that forced the Scottish Government to scrap its more wide-ranging Air Route Development Fund in 2007.
It had been planning to submit the proposals to Europe for final approval earlier this year. Edinburgh and Glasgow would have been too big to be admissible, though SE was planning to offer them the consolation of a wider push to support the industry, along with other interested groups such as VisitScotland.
However, SE changed its mind and delayed the whole scheme in favour of a rethink. It is now planning to launch a scheme to benefit all Scottish airports, and long-haul as well as short-haul, although it had yet to decide what form this will take.
The news comes at a time when the Scottish industry is nervous about the future of short-haul, which took a knock last month when Flybe announced it was scrapping its Inverness-London route and selling the slots to easyJet.
Julian Taylor, SE's executive director of strategy and economics, said: "We believe we can deliver more extensive support that will benefit all Scottish airports and help us to secure major new routes.
"We hope to announce further details over the next few months."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article