These were among the findings of yesterday’s publication, “Unlocking Potential: a report on veterinary expertise in food animal production” by Professor Philip Lowe aiming to tackle some of the concerns raised by the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Efra) Select Committee inquiry into vets and veterinary services in 2003.
Among a string of recommendations, it calls for the “renewal” of the relationship between farmers and vets.
The report addresses some of the issues raised by the Efra Select Committee into veterinary services in 2003, and during the 2001 foot-and- mouth inquiries. It looks at the numbers and the role of farm vets working in livestock and food production.
Worryingly, it found only 10% of practices now had farm clients and suggested that decline would continue, falling another 27% by 2016.
There was, said Lowe, an urgent need to overcome the “increasing marginalisation” of farm vets within the profession and a need to rethink relationships with farmers and with the government.
Welcoming the report, Nicky Paul, president of the British Veterinary Association, said: “With the recent Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs consultation on responsibility and cost sharing and a proposed new structure for animal health in the UK, now is the right time for vets to take stock of where we are going.
“Professor Lowe’s report sets out a number of challenges and we welcome the opportunity to consult widely with our members and take forward ideas and proposals to ensure a healthy future for the veterinary profession. Over the years vets have adapted to many changes and the profession has never shied away from these challenges.
“Although the primary focus of the report is veterinary surgeons working in farm and food animal practice, many of the issues raised cut across the whole of the profession. We will be seeking the views of all our members and divisions to ensure we are at the centre of shaping how the recommendations are taken forward.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article