THE results from the first 100 analysis of this year's first cut silages by Davidsons Animal Feeds has revealed that quality is mixed and lower than last year.
Commenting on the results, James Collantine, a livestock feed adviser at Davidsons said: "The ideal silage has a dry matter (DM) of more than 30 per cent, but the average in our first 100 samples this year is only 26.4 per cent.
"Likewise a metabolisable energy (ME) result of more than 11.0 would be desirable in first cut silage, but so far this year many silages have failed to get anywhere near this figure.
"The highest result from our 100 samples was 11.4 and the lowest 9.3. The average was 10.2. The crude protein (CP) figure is a guide to whether the silage will provide enough protein to the rumen microorganisms. One would hope for a CP figure in the region of 14-16 per cent, but this year sees very poor results.
"The average is 12.9 per cent, but one result is as low as 8.1 per cent compared to the top result, 16.5 per cent.
"Unfortunately the D Values (a measure of digestibility) and sugar levels in the sampled silages are also below desirable levels. Sugars in particular are only found at an average level of 25g/kg of DM when the target figure should be in excess of double that."
Mr Collantine added: "The reality is that silage quality is proving to be very variable and we would urge dairy, beef and sheep farmers to get their first and subsequent silages analysed."
Milk Price falls
Meanwhile, prices crashed by an average of 8.4 per cent at this week's Global Dairy Trade auction. Prices are now 50 per cent back on where they were in February and this week's bad trade follows on from an 8.9 per cent fall three weeks ago.
Main movers in this week's auction were cheddar which was down 10.2 per cent, whole milk powder down 11.5 per cent and skimmed milk powder down 6.5 per cent, while butter was back 9.6 per cent.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article