Ex Machina (15)
four stars
Dir: Alex Garland
With: Domhnall Gleeson, Alicia Vikander, Oscar Isaac
Runtime: 108 minutes
AS befits a psychological thriller that features much mucking around with science, Alex Garland's whip-smart and stylish psychological thriller manages the neat trick of being in two places at once. While set in the shiny, high tech near future, the men and the motives it explores could hail from any point in grubby old human history. This is what makes it so compelling; that and the very cool sight of a robot made flesh.
Produced by Glasgow-born Andrew Macdonald (Trainspotting, The Last King of Scotland), Ex Machina is the directorial debut of Alex Garland, previously best known as the writer of 28 Days Later and Sunshine. It does not feel like a debut though, such is the confidence with which Garland snares the viewer and keeps them close, the better to keep his story's secrets.
Front of camera is a trio of actors who between them have greedily snaffled some of the choicest parts of the year. There is Oscar Isaac (also to be seen this week in A Most Violent Year and, later, Star Wars), plus Ireland's Domhnall Gleeson (coming soon to Brooklyn and Star Wars) and Alicia Vikander (excellent in A Royal Affair and Testament of Youth, outstanding here). Together, Garland and his cast keep the show on the road in a slick enough fashion to gloss over any imperfections that arise along the way.
Gleeson plays Caleb, a computer programmer at some nameless tech conglomerate in the US. A message flags up on his computer screen one day to tell him he has won the golden ticket of spending a week with the big boss at his home in the mountains. Caleb is duly impressed by the boss's gaff, a glass and wood mansion with its own waterfall in the back garden. He is even more awe-struck by the head honcho himself. Nathan (Isaac) is a cool guy. A child genius turned tech gazillionaire, Nathan likes to play hard and works hard, never more so than on his current project - Artificial Intelligence. Nathan is after nothing less than the holy grail of AI, a robot that can pass the Turing Test by convincing an examiner that they are talking to a fellow human and not a mess of wires and circuits.
Nathan has a treat for Caleb - he can conduct the test on a machine called Ava (played by Vikander), and report straight to the boss himself. It is the chance of a lifetime, one an ambitious young man would be crazy to turn down. Or crazy to take up.
Gleeson (Frank, Calvary) has the skinny young ingenue act down to a T, but here he gives his character a few more layers, all of them interesting. Isaac's character, with a build like a bull and a nature to match, is as much alluring as disturbing. Here is the mortal who who wants to play god with nature, to bring about nothing less than an evolution revolution. Between the two of them, Gleeson and Isaac might have taken up all the screen space and the interest, but not this time. Not with Vikander and a costume job that offers up one of the most arresting visions one will see in the cinema this year. Much in the same way the robot in Metropolis wowed the age, so Ava is a sight to see. Half fake flesh, half transparent, topped off with Vikander's stunning face, she is mesmerising. Question is: what will Caleb make of her?
From this three way relationship between the domineering boss, the captivating test subject and the wide-eyed student, Garland concocts a tale that builds by twist and turn, always trying to stay one step ahead of the audience. If he goes too far at times, or is not quite convincing enough, the flaw is easily forgotten in the great rush and sweep of things. This is science fiction at its most seductive, creating a world set in the future that seems frighteningly close at hand. A film to marvel at, with ideas to argue over, all the way home.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article