Britain's banks must do more to protect themselves and the wider financial system from growing and evolving cyber crime, the Bank of England said on Friday.
Worried by the increasing rate of attacks on banks by Internet hacks, the BoE surveyed 36 financial firms and banks in Britain and found no immediate critical shortcomings in their defences.
"But they did point to areas for improvement that we will be following up on with firms," Andrew Gracie, an executive director at the BoE in charge of winding down failed lenders, told a Cyber Defence and Security Network conference.
Britain has already conducted cyber attack simulation exercises such as Waking Shark to test responses.
A joint testing programme between the U.S. and UK governments and authorities will start this year.
Gracie suggested that banks were still fighting the last war to some extent, such as protecting physical locations.
"These still matter. But cyber changes the game. Cyber is a dynamic, intelligent and adaptive threat. In the cyber arms race, costs are stacked in favour of the attacker, not the defender," Mr Gracie said.
He said banks must invest in ways to identify threat and cyber attacks, a task that should not be left just to junior "technologists".
"All parts of an organisation need to understand cyber risk and their responsibilities towards improved cyber hygiene. This includes Board level engagement," Mr Gracie said.
Craig Balding, group head of cyber risk at Barclays , said the bank was evolving its approach to cyber risk, making a distinction between cyber and technology systems.
"Cyber has the attention of our board, no question about it," he told the conference. "I don't know if we can ever be ahead of the threat as a commercial organisation."
Gracie said banks were already spending significant amounts of money on building their defences but they were not testing them on a regular basis.
To help banks improve their resilience, the BoE would help them share information, Gracie said.
"We don't laugh when somebody else is getting hacked," Mr Balding said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article