SCOTTISH bosses are the best behaved in Britain, with many likening their supervisors to the fair but tough-talking manager of Manchester United, Sir Alex Ferguson.
A survey found that nearly two-thirds (63%) of workers in Scotland rated their bosses' behaviour as good, compared with 28% in the south-west of England. London bosses were found to be well behaved, but across Britain as a whole, around one in three (35%) was found to not behave well, with the actions of 11% described as bad or despicable.
And it seems Scottish workers like the tough but fair approach from managers, with most comparing their superiors with Sir Alex, one of Govan's best-known sons.
Less flatteringly, 10% of respondents throughout Britain compared their boss to Ricky Gervais's David Brent character from The Office.
The survey, carried out by ICM on behalf of management consultancy Inspiring Business Performance (IBP), considered the impact of bad leadership on company profits and employee productivity.
But while Scots topped the popularity chart, it seems their behaviour is not always good. Some Scots bosses were guilty of using bad language, bullying, lying and breaching confidentiality. Such behaviour might help explain why many staff across Britain have taken matters into their own hands.
Faced with unwelcome behaviour, 13% said they had sought a another job, while 4% said they had quit a job without a new one to go to. In addition, 10% claimed bad behaviour from their boss had caused them to purposely disrupt the workplace, with 8% admitting to feigning illness to skip work.
The survey also found men generally had a lower opinion of line managers than women and were more likely to directly challenge bad behaviour.
"Bosses in Scotland are doing something right," said John Telfer, managing director of IBP. "However, there are always some rotten apples."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article