Shale gas is a revolutionary source of power that the UK and Scotland must move fast to exploit, a panel of top energy bosses has urged.
The leading industrialists, including Sir Ian Wood, former chairman of Wood Group, and Ian Marchant chief executive of Scottish and Southern Energy, were taking part in a special Strathclyde University seminar at Glasgow Science Centre on Monday to mark the award of honorary degrees to six top industry figures. The degree recipients included Keith Cochrane of Weir Group, Jose Ignacio Sanchez Galan of Iberdrola, Steve Holliday of National Grid, and the Department of Energy and Climate Change's chief scientific adviser, Professor David Mackay.
Shale gas, extracted by the controversial fracking process, was endorsed by the panel as a source of adaptable low-carbon energy to complement renewable power. Mr Cochrane said Aberdeen, with its established industry, could be "the hub for Europe-wide development of shale oil and shale gas".
Sir Ian, described by Strathclyde principal and vice-chancellor Professor Sir Jim McDonald as "the patriarch" of the Scots energy industry, said: "I'm not saying shale gas is a [complete] solution but it is more efficient, more cost-effective and the reserves are absolutely gigantic across the world.
"In five to 10 years time we will have an entirely different mindset about gas and we will realise that there has been a revolution and that there is a major new energy source available."
Mr Marchant added: "There is a lot more gas in the world at cheaper prices than we thought five or six years ago. Gas-fired generation can be built in two to two-and-a-half years. It can be very flexible, providing the balancing services that [the grid] needs. A combination of gas and renewables can keep us on our carbon trajectory in the UK and in Scotland for probably the next 15-20 years."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article