The first payments under the Bank of England’s emergency liquidity assistance scheme were made on October 1, a week before the Government announced a massive rescue of the sector.
The money was repaid by January.
The news, disclosed in a letter to the House of Commons Treasury committee, is further evidence of how close the two Edinburgh banks were to collapsing last year because the rest of the market refused to give them funding.
Bank of England governor Mervyn King told MPs the money provided a “bridge” to the recapitalisation of the banks in October 2008 and January 2009.
He added that even now, support from the public sector to UK banks under various other schemes “runs into many hundreds of billions of pounds”.
He said: “It is right that householders and companies expect fundamental reform to the structure and regulation of the whole financial system.”
Treasury committee chairman John McFall said the news caused an “intake of breath”.
“How many universities, colleges, jobs could we support with this? It gives credence to the view that we really need to fix this situation.”
King said details of the emergency support was kept secret until the two banks had finalised their latest bail-out packages earlier this month.
The Bank first gave HBOS emergency cash on October 1 last year.
HBOS’s use of the scheme peaked at £25.4bn on November 13, even as veteran bankers Sir George Mathewson and Sir Peter Burt were campaigning for it to remain independent of Lloyds. It repaid all the money by January 16, just four days after a legal decision gave the merger the go-ahead.
RBS first received funding on October 7, the day after its shares fell 40% in just one trading session. It repaid it by December 16. Its use peaked at £36.6bn on October 17, when total lending to the institutions reached a high of £61.6bn.
In return, the banks handed over £100bn of mortgages and loans as collateral.
Threadneedle Street paid the Treasury a fee of 1.7% over the two months in order to access the cash.
Bank of England deputy governor Paul Tucker said: “This was tough stuff, a classic lender of last resort operation.”
Responding to claims by MP Jim Cousins that given the cost of the scheme, RBS and HBOS would have been “better off going to American Express”, Tucker said: “Yes, but American Express may not have been.”
He added that the £100bn of assets were taken to protect the Bank and the cost was to deter other institutions from making similar mistakes.
“It was effective in buying time,” Tucker said.
King criticised banks that have moved back into risky areas of investment banking as the financial crisis has eased, saying: “I have in one or two instances been concerned that banks, particularly those in receipt of Government support, felt it was attractive to go down the road of re-establishing an investment banking operation rather than what I thought their original intention was, which was to go back to good, old-fashioned commercial banking.”
He again called for action to ensure failing banks are allowed to collapse.
He said: “We cannot end up with a situation where any regulator feels, or any Government feels, that any institution is too important or too big to fail.”
He rejected the use of regulation alone to keep banks in check and said: “If regulators are that clever, why not let them run the banks?”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article