Whisky exports were worth a record £4.27 billion last year, despite less of the drink going overseas.
A total of 1.19 billion bottles of whisky were exported, 5% fewer than in 2011.
But increased demand for more expensive premium blended whisky and the growing popularity of single malts meant that the overall value of exports increased by 1%.
Whisky exports are now worth 87% more than they were a decade ago.
A total of £758 million-worth of whisky was exported to the US last year, up more than £100 million from 2011, making it the drink's biggest market by value.
The value of exports to Latvia was up 48%, worth £79.1 million last year. But the value of whisky exported to both Spain and France dropped considerably, by 25% and 19% respectively.
The Scotch Whisky Association said changes in excise tax in France in 2012 led to buyers there stocking up on the drink the previous year.
France was still the largest market by volume for whisky, with 153.9 million bottles exported there last year.
Gavin Hewitt, chief executive of the association, said: "Scotch whisky continues to lead the way for UK food and drink exports. A combination of successful trade negotiations, excellent marketing by producers, growing demand from mature markets, particularly the USA, and the growing middle class in emerging economies helped exports hit a record £4.3 billion last year.
"We deliver a remarkable £135 a second to the UK balance of trade. We are contributing massively to the Government's wish for an export-led recovery.
"There is confidence in the future of the industry, illustrated by the £2 billion capital investment that Scotch whisky producers have committed over the next three to four years. New distilleries have opened and older ones brought back to use to meet rising demand."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article