CRUDE oil prices have climbed to an 18-month high after a major deal between Opec and other major producers to cut supply officially came into effect.
Prices for global benchmark Brent crude rose 2.4 per cent to $58.10 (£47.34) on Tuesday, marking its highest level since July 2015.
Investors were cheering the kick-off of a production cut deal struck by Opec and non-member oil-producing states including Russia late last year.
The agreement - which was effective as of January 1 - is meant to address a supply glut in a bid to buoy floundering prices.
Brent crude fell as low as $27.26 per barrel (£22.20) in January 2016.
Nicholas Hyett, an equity analyst at Hargreaves Lansdown, said: "Twelve months ago, oil prices were eyeing their lowest prices in more than a decade. What a difference a year makes.
"Today Brent crude is flirting with 60 dollars for the first time in 18 months. That's welcome news for heavily indebted E&P (exploration and production) companies such as Tullow Oil, up 4.4 per cent, where the extra cash will be key to cleaning up the balance sheet."
In the UK, investor optimism also sent BP shares higher by 1.6 per cent and Royal Dutch Shell "B" shares up by 0.25 per cent.
But Bjarne Schieldrop, chief commodities analyst at Nordic corporate bank SEB, doubts the rally will last.
"While 2016 started bearishly and ended bullishly, we expect 2017 to be the opposite but not as extreme. Oil inventories are likely to draw down in the first half of 2017 as Opec cuts production, while US shale oil production - which was falling in 2016 - is going to rise this year."
He expects Brent prices to trade around $55 per barrel (£44.84) in the first quarter, $57.50 (£46.89) in the second quarter, but drop to $52.50 (£42.79) per barrel during the final three months of 2017.
Mr Schieldrop explained that prices will have to fall in order to halt US shale production, which is set to rise by 30 rigs per month between January and June.
"In the face of a further strong rise in US oil rigs in the first half of this year, we think it will be difficult for Opec to agree to roll forward their production cuts into H2 2017," he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here