A SET of strong results and bullish words on possible acquisitions suggest Shepherd and Wedderburn can retain its place at the top table of independent Scottish law firms.
Two of its traditional big four rivals - Dundas & Wilson and McGrigors - have been taken up into much larger firms while the other, Maclay Murray & Spens, is also known to have explored mergers on more than one occasion. Alongside that Burness Paull, a product of an all-Scottish merger, and Brodies have disrupted and challenged what was once a comfortable quartet at the top of the Scottish legal sector.
So for Shepherd and Wedderburn to still be around in its current form and posting large increases in revenue and profit might be a tentative sign that the worst is over, certainly at the upper end of the market.
The firm has been fortunate, or well managed depending on how you view these things, in that it carries no debt so has not been forced to pursue a merger.
At a time of growing internationalisation it feels a London base can still provide a lot of opportunity especially when supplemented by its operations in Aberdeen, Edinburgh and Glasgow. With chief executive Stephen Gibb signalling trading in the new financial year has continued to build on recent momentum it will be interesting to see whether other Scottish firms are also capitalising on the apparent strengthening on the economic recovery.
Further mergers in the sector appear inevitable but perhaps more firms will have a greater degree of choice on whether to stay independent.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article