Followers of the Scottish Government's politically useful "shovel-ready" projects list might have noticed that one of these, the £2 million for pier upgrading for the Gourock-Dunoon ferry, is opposed by local MSP and beleaguered Scottish Government minister, Mike Russell.
Even if he doesn't exactly "rail against" them, as the campaigning Cowal Courier has it, he is quoted as being "not a great fan of the [pier] pontoons idea".
As Russell is painfully aware, this is a subject on which local passions run high. Voters in the Cowal peninsula hate the pontoons proposal as it would entrench a passenger-only service they see as unfit for purpose (because the lighter craft are often cancelled). As route-user and Strathclyde University professor Neil Mackay has it, a reliable service is essential to local commuters, who prefer the heavier and less weather-dependent car ferry service.
Russell's equivocation stems from the SNP Government's consistent hints that the car ferry could be reinstated, which is not what Transport Scotland officials say. All of which begs the question: should this project be removed from the list, and how many of the other "shovel-ready" projects on the list are, in fact, completely unready, for reasons of local politics?
The word-of-mouth success of CeeD, the nitty-grittiest of Scottish B2B forums, in which manufacturers and engineers large and small share their problems and successes for the greater benefit of Scottish manufacturing, continues apace.
Flourishing below the radar of publicity, CeeD provides a welcome antidote to the gloom often reported as though closures and retrenchment were the only story in the Scottish economy.
Expect big strides forward to be announced at the group's annual lunch on Tuesday in Cumbernauld, to be addressed by the biggest fish in Scottish business, Jim McColl, as well as Kenny McGee of Component Sense, Robin MacGeachy of Peak Scientific Instruments and Rodney Ayre of Mitsubishi Electric Air Conditioning Systems.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article