CLIVE Miquel's decision to bar The Herald from yesterday's meeting of shareholders in Lees Foods was as baffling as it was lamentable.
The outcome of the £5.6 million management buyout bid for Lees Foods that Mr Miquel has made with fellow directors is one that will concern many private and institutional shareholders in the company and will be studied across the business community.
The importance of shareholder democracy has been highlighted in recent weeks as investors made their feelings known to company directors. A feature of the shows of assertiveness seen in the so-called shareholder spring has been the insistence that management teams are accountable to investors. Those who can not attend investor meetings should be able to get an accurate account of what happens at them.
In line with the standards The Herald upholds, the newspaper has been scrupulously even-handed in its coverage of the MBO bid by Mr Miquel's team. The Herald has reported on the claims of some shareholders that the 230p per share offer undervalues the company. But it has also recorded the view of the Union of Shop, Distributive and Allied Workers, which represents much of Lees' 270-strong workforce, that the bid would be in the best interests of its members.
Against that backdrop Mr Miquel's move is especially hard to fathom. Such action from listed Scottish companies is extremely rare.
Lees Foods may end up being a private company when the fate of the MBO bid is decided. For now it is a public company and must demonstrate the openness and accountability required of such companies. Shareholders will hope that such qualities will be on display throughout the remainder of the bid process.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article