We bent our rules to give engineering giant IMI the benefit of the doubt last week as its shares triggered a sell signal under our stop-loss system.
The company, one of our original top picks for 2014, had seen its shares slide to their published stop-loss level on fears over the impact of the strong pound on its big overseas earnings.
But we feel the pessimism has been overdone and are prepared to hang on to our notional holding a little longer in anticipation of a good recovery in the run-up to next month's interim results, which should show solid growth.
Our other tips produced a more steady performance after the falls of the previous week, although a small majority were still showing losses when we carried out our review of progress on Wednesday morning.
These loss-makers included big overseas earners such as Stagecoach, WPP and Halma, while drinks groups Fuller Smith & Turner and Greene King were hit by thoughts customers could cut back on entertainment because of the slow pace of earnings growth compared with rising inflation.
Fortunately, the losses were largely counterbalanced by some good gains elsewhere, with Anglo-American jeweller Signet still gaining from its recent merger while Marks & Spencer, Saga and Dialight were among those to attract bargain-hunters after recent falls.
However, the longstanding 2011 portfolio was down nearly 1.5% over the week as result of the Fuller Smith setback and profit-taking in distribution group, DCC.
Our recent nominal purchase of shares in cash-and-carry group Booker also slipped back after the shares began trading without benefit of a 3.5p special dividend.
Our latest 2014 tips saw a further 0.7% slippage over the week, caused mainly by IMI.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article