David Ogilvy, partner and head of employment and dispute resolution at Turcan Connell, a leading adviser to individuals, businesses, families and charities, explains why individuals prosper through private ownership.
Private individuals prosper through private ownership.
This has been proven to be true in relation to housing stock where many thousands were given the opportunity to enjoy the benefits of private ownership. Society as a whole benefited from the pride which this new generation of home owners invested in their new homes. Subsequent generations of those pioneering tenants who became owners continue to benefit from that ownership interest.
The principle that individuals prosper through private ownership is true of share ownership. Having a stake in something ought to be the greatest motive for wanting to look after it. Private share ownership works. We saw this with the denationalisation programs of the 1980s which gave many people their first ever opportunity to own shares and we saw this more recently with the return to private ownership of a long nationalised monopoly service. The interest in that privatisation from employees proves how popular employee share ownership can be.
The UK Government is currently promoting share ownership in a different way. Changes recently brought in by the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013 are designed to stimulate interest in share ownership by employees. It does this by creating an incentive for both employee and employer to agree on a scheme of ownership.
The incentive for the employer is that in return for shares the new breed of employees (known as employee shareholders) will give up a range of employment rights. In particular, the employee shareholder gives up the right not to be unfairly dismissed (apart from automatic unfair dismissal), the right to receive a statutory redundancy payment, the statutory right to request flexible working and certain statutory rights in respect of time off for training.
The incentive for the employee shareholder is that in return for giving up those rights the employee shareholder receives at least £2,000 worth of shares in the company tax free.
So employee shareholders have the opportunity to acquire an ownership interest in the company for which they work.
On a philosophical level the legislation is to be welcomed. It has merit both in its own terms and in its consistency with past successful initiatives.
There are however a number of key problems with the legislation.
For example, the employee needs to take complex legal advice and is required to understand the complex nature of share ownership. The employee will need to be advised and appreciate that acquisition of shares alone does not in itself bring with it a right to receive a dividend or a right to vote. Employees will need to be advised on the disadvantages of being a minority shareholder and the problems associated with termination.
Although the legislation provides that the company should make a payment of the reasonable fees incurred by the employee in taking legal advice, the advice which needs to be given is substantial. Employees with a limited understanding of Company Law will need a significant amount of help and might find the whole prospect too daunting.
Similarly, it is argued that the incentive for employers does not go far enough. Probably the most complicated and sophisticated of employment rights are those relating to discrimination. Those rights are unaffected and cannot in any event be taken away by the UK Parliament.
So although the principle behind the legislation is a worthwhile one the real concern is that the legislation does not go far enough in incentivising either employees or employers. Accordingly the take up on this scheme will be poor and the government will not achieve the attitude shift which the legislation is designed to promote.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article