SCOTTISH private equity veteran Bill Nixon has voiced a preference for the UK to leave the European Union, and highlighted his view that Brexit would not trigger a second referendum on Scottish independence.
Looking ahead to the June 23 referendum on the UK’s membership of the European Union, Mr Nixon said: “I can see the argument for and against the EU in the EU debate. I think, on balance, I favour a Brexit.”
Mr Nixon, who is managing partner of Glasgow-based Maven Capital Partners, added: “After any initial shock, I think, over the medium term, it is likely to give Britain greater flexibility.”
Noting that the UK imported far more from other countries in the EU than it exported to members of the free trade bloc, Mr Nixon declared: “I personally think the suggestion of a trade war is overplayed, given the balance of exports versus imports.”
There has been significant speculation that a vote by the UK to leave the EU could trigger a second Scottish independence referendum, if the electorate north of the Border were to make plain its preference to stay in the free trade bloc.
Mr Nixon said: “I think that I would say, personally, I would be surprised if there was another independence referendum if the vote was Brexit, unless there was a serious economic shock, given I think there is now increasing recognition that the likely deficit for an independent Scotland now, given the oil price shock, would be significantly higher, and I think, objectively, most people can now see now is not the time to be championing the cause for independence.”
Under Mr Nixon's leadership, Maven has grown into a private equity, mezzanine finance, and property business with about £400 million of funds under management.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel