Katherine Garret-Cox has won the Veuve Clicquot 'Businesswoman of the Year' award for her "inspirational" leadership of Alliance Trust.
The award judges said the 47-year-old mother of four was "a figurehead for career-minded women", and noted her "continued success and clear demonstration as a standout female role model". The combined assets of the company, adding Alliance Trust Investments to the 127-year-old trust, had doubled in three years to £5.6bn, according to the citation.
But ironically since her nomination for the award, the trust's chief executive since 2008 has had to pacify disgruntled shareholders who backed the campaign by hedge fund Elliott Advisors for boardroom change at Alliance.
Mrs Garrett-Cox, who became one of the City's highest-profile women 20 years ago, has also been under shareholder scrutiny for her £1.3million pay whilst earning only a minimum bonus due to the trust's underperformance.
She commented on the award: "So many exceptional women have been recognised over its 43-year history and I'm proud to shine a light on female success in financial services."
Commentators have mischievously noted that the award has preceded turbulent times for many recipients over the years. Last year's winner Harriet Green, credited with transforming the fortunes of Thomas Cook, stepped down unexpectedly as chief executive in November. The 2006 winner Vivienne Cox found herself out of a job at BP a few months later, as did GoFly leader Barbara Cassani in 2002 and the 1998 winner Sophie Mirman when Sock Shop went into decline.
The only other Scottish winners of the award in its 43 years have been Stagecoach co-founder Ann Gloag in 1990 and Norfrost creator Patricia Grant in 1986.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.Â
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.Â
That is invaluable.Â
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article