Scotland??s higher-priced property areas are likely to see a transaction boom over the next four months as buyers and sellers scramble to dodge huge mark-ups in stamp duty.
Scotland??s higher-priced property areas are likely to see a transaction boom over the next four months as buyers and sellers scramble to dodge huge mark-ups in stamp duty.
The Land and Buildings Transaction Tax, Scotland??s first big standalone tax affecting consumers, had already been seen as hitting buyers in more expensive areas when it arrives next April.
But the Chancellor??s emulation of its tiered approach, in an immediate switch to a tiered system in England and Wales, has cast a harsh spotlight on the new differentials on either side of the Border.
Philip Hogg, chief executive of Homes for Scotland, said: ??With all buyers purchasing homes over £325,000 previously set to be worse off under the new Scottish proposals, we have already raised our concerns that this risks stagnating the market by detrimentally impacting the middle and upper levels and called for the introduction of an additional band between £250,000 and £500,000 that would enable Scotland to remain competitive with the rest of the UK.??
He said after April house purchases over £255,000 would now be more expensive in Scotland. ??For example, the buyer of a £350,000 home in Scotland will pay £4,800 more in tax than their counterparts in England who will have seen their costs decrease.??
Stephen Hay at advisers Baker Tilly said: ??At £300,000 the cost is still £2,300 or 46 per cent more, at £700,000 is £22,300 or 89 per cent more and at £900,000 it is £42,300 or 120 per cent more. You can bet your mortgage that there will be a steep rise in residential property sales in Edinburgh, Glasgow and Aberdeen between now and April 2015.??
Alison Mitchell, at financial advisers Robson Macintosh in Edinburgh, said buyers at lower levels would be better off in Scotland. But she went on: ??I am seeing a client next week who was wanting to buy a house after April but they are jumping in and bringing it forward. Their stamp duty would have been £30,000, now they are going to be paying £50,000 unless they move quickly.??
In more positive moves for savers and the better off, the Isa limit will rise to £15,240, and Isas will be able to pass tax-free to a spouse on death.
Surviving spouses will be allowed an additional one-off ISA allowance, equal to the amount the deceased spouse had in their ISAs, which can be used from April 2015. Danny Cox at Hargreaves Lansdown said: ??This change has righted a wrong in the tax system which was the source of deep frustration and additional cost for surviving spouses.??
Annuities will also pass tax-free to a spouse if death is before 75, adding to the recent scrapping of the 55 per cent ??death tax?? on pensions, and putting annuities on the same footing as drawdown.
Andrew Tully at MGM Advantage warned: ??It is worth keeping in mind this change will only benefit the estate of those who die before age 75. If you are a healthy 65 year old, then you have a 90 per cent chance of surviving your 75th birthday. If you have moderate health conditions, for example diabetes or high blood pressure, then you have an 80 per cent chance of surviving your 75th birthday.??
Julie Hutchison at Standard Life said: ??The combined value of a surviving partner??s ISA account will ultimately be included in their own estate for IHT. Those near to or already over age 55 may want to consider moving some of these savings into a pension, potentially allowing the pension fund to be passed on to their children and grandchildren tax free.??
Fidelity??s retirement director Alan Higham said the new freedoms could lead to people in poor health applying to transfer their pensions out of final salary schemes ?? and being subject to medical checks.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article