BUSINESS owners are being warned to be wary of a "funding solution" for their businesses which could put their personal pensions at risk.
The scheme works by identifying intellectual property (IP) within the business, obtaining an independent valuation of the IP, and using the owner's Sipp (self-invested personal pension) to buy it in the same way as it might buy a property.
But according to Gordon Forbes at Caledonia Asset Management in Edinburgh, creating a value for IP within a business could create a new tax liability, and it also raises regulatory and investment questions.
"Unlike the process of pension funding of a tangible asset such as commercial property, where there is an identifiable and separate secondary market on sale, this cannot be said of IP – so in this case the pension-holder is putting their pension at very serious risk," he warned.
He said investors approaching his firm for a second opinion had been invited to transfer all their existing pension pots into to a Sipp, involving "very substantial" fees, and added: "There are plenty of examples of this type of manoeuvre leaving a Sipp virtually worthless after unsuccessful attempts to gain liquidity from the 'sale' of the so-called IP in future.
"Indeed, the most recent alert from the FSA on regulated Sipp advice in relation to unregulated investments generally, makes it clear that investors should be aware of the pitfalls of such a strategy for their pension."
The Herald reported this week that Bristol-based Clifton Asset Management staged a Glasgow seminar to promote a strategy involving IP and pensions, claiming it had the potential to create "£100 billion of funding" for small businesses starved of bank funding.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article